Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guido | Canada28's avatar

Excellent breakdown — the supplier map is especially useful. Your closing line captures it: twelve submarines, one message.

What strikes me is that the strategic case and the industrial case point the same way here. Interoperability with Germany and Norway, deeper SAFE participation, and a two-way door into Europe’s defence market — these reinforce each other rather than compete. That’s rare in a procurement this size.

The fair counterpoint, visible even in your comments, is scepticism about the economic promises and about “tying” Canada to any one partner. Worth taking seriously. But an offset package only becomes real through exactly the kind of domestic ecosystem you’ve mapped — which is why the supplier commitments matter more than the headline numbers. Following your work closely; this is the conversation that needs having.

Unfiltered's avatar

I do not want to tied to Europe.

Nobody asked me.

It is my tax dollars.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?